Legal Opinion
People v. Vinokurow
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1948No. Docket No. 68, Calendar No. 43,792PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bushneix,, C. J.
Defendants Helen Vinokurow and Vidos Vinokurow, husband and wife, appeal from a conviction of the crime of bribery. The statute defining this specific crime (Act No. 328, § 117, Pub. Acts 1931 [Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, § 17115-117, Stat. Ann. § 28.312]), is as follows:
“Any person who shall corruptly give, offer or promise to any public office^, agent, servant or employee, after the election or appointment of such public officer, agent, servant or employee and either before or after such public officer, agent, servant or employee shall have been qualified or shall take his seat,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. SalsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. McGarryMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. CarrierMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- People v. De MeauxMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. MullisMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. RitholzMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. O'NEILLMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- People v. DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 1977