Legal Opinion

Cowan v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 15, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

Counsel for appellees has correctly stated the case and the issues as follows: “The Luxora & Little River Road Improvement District No. 2 was created by orders of the county court under the Alexander Road Law, many years ago, and the limit of its right to issue -bonds to the extent of 30 per cent, of the assessed value, as provided by the Alexander Road Law, was raised to 50 per cent, -of the assessed value by special act No. 253, passed by the -General Assembly in 1920'. Bonds were issued amounting to approximately 50 per cent, of the assessed value of real property in the district, and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. KerbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Hout v. HarveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Howell v. LambersomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Carson v. Road Improvement District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  5. Taylor v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glencoe Paving Company v. GravesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Berry v. Cousart Bayou Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Mooring v. Wardell & Whitton Road Maintenance District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. State, Use Garland County v. Balesh.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. Whalen v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API