Cowan v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.
Counsel for appellees has correctly stated the case and the issues as follows: “The Luxora & Little River Road Improvement District No. 2 was created by orders of the county court under the Alexander Road Law, many years ago, and the limit of its right to issue -bonds to the extent of 30 per cent, of the assessed value, as provided by the Alexander Road Law, was raised to 50 per cent, -of the assessed value by special act No. 253, passed by the -General Assembly in 1920'. Bonds were issued amounting to approximately 50 per cent, of the assessed value of real property in the district, and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. KerbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Hout v. HarveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Howell v. LambersomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Carson v. Road Improvement District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Taylor v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glencoe Paving Company v. GravesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Berry v. Cousart Bayou Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Mooring v. Wardell & Whitton Road Maintenance District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- State, Use Garland County v. Balesh.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Whalen v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.