Legal Opinion

Kirby Planing-Mill Co. v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 9, 1912No. 4169PublishedCited by 4 opinions

" Complaint; 'from city court of Thomasville — Judge W, H. Hammond. March 19, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. There was no abuse of discretion in refusing a continuance for the purpose of enabling the defendant to procure the testimony of witnesses residing in Boston, Massachusetts, the showing for continuance indicating laches, since there was no effort to procure this testimony until eight days before the case was called for trial, and no reason was shown for this delay.

2. The proffered amendment to the plea being after the time for answer . had expired, and setting up new facts, of which the original plea failed to give any notice, and the amendment not being verified by affidavit as required…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barrie v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Hartwell Grocery Co. v. Mountain City Mill Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Shierling Bros. v. Richland Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Early v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  2. Wilkes v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Louisiana Red Cypress Co. v. Gilmore & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Atlanta Chemical Co. v. Hardin Bag Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API