Legal Opinion
Aura Spa & Boutique v. Department of Workforce Services
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided August 17, 2017No. 20160341-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ORME, Judge:
¶ 1 Aura Spa <& Boutique (the Spa) petitions for judicial review of the Workforce Appeals Board’s decision that concluded the Spa’s workers were employees rather than independent contractors for purposes of Utah’s employment security regime. We decline to disturb the board’s determination.
¶ 2 The Spa offered massages and various esthetic services to its customers. In providing these services, the Spa contracted with individual massage therapists and estheti-cians, paying them a commission for the services they rendered. The Spa set the prices for the services, and it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Betty Jordan v. Kelly BinnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Kaleena MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Prosper, Inc. v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Evolocity, Inc. v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- C.Y. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Onysko v. Dept. of Envntl. QualityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Zak v. Dep't of Workforce Servs. & Workforce Appeals Bd.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2019