Legal Opinion

Tarzana Providence Health System v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 30, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2022-1509Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TARZANA PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:22-cv-01509 (TNM) v. XAVIER BECERRA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION “Men must turn square corners when they deal with the Government. If it attaches even purely formal conditions to its consent to be sued those conditions must be complied with.” Rock Isl. Ark. & La. R.R. Co. v. United States,

254 U.S. 141, 143

(1920). This case exemplifies that principle. Plaintiffs, a bevy of hospitals that object to a Medicare regulation, did not comply with the conditions Congress placed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API