Richardson & Boynton Co. v. Independent District of Hampton
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from FranhUn District Court. Aotion to recover a balance due plaintiff for beating apparatus furnished to defendant. The cause was tried without a jury, and judgment rendered for defendant. Plaintiff apjieals.
1Opinion of the CourtBeok, J.
I. The petition alleges that the plaintiff, a corporation, entered into a written contract with defendant to 1. CONTBACT : compromise11’' of differences. supply heating apparatus for its school-house, for 1 1 ■' ° 1 x ’ ifc was to Pa7 plaintiff the sum of $1,050. piie contracj; p inscribes the work, and the character thereof, to be done by plaintiff, and the ldnd and character of the apparatus to be furnished by it, and the time when the whole shall be ready for use. These terms of the contract need not be more particularly referred to here. It contains a wan’anty that the apparatus “ will…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Adams v. MortonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
3Cited by12 opinions
- Partello v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Goodman Manufacturing Co. v. Mammoth Vein Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Messer v. Washington National InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Cantonwine v. Bosch Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- White v. FloodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.