Berry v. State

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

Nathan Berry, Jr., convicted by a jury of numerous offenses, including four counts of burglary, 1 appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for new trial. He contests the sufficiency of the evidence, argues that trial counsel was ineffective, and contends that the trial court committed reversible error by giving additional instructions to the jury in the jury room without waiver of Berry’s presence.

1. We first consider enumerations 3, 4, and 5, 2 all of which raise the issue of the legal sufficiency of the evidence. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC…