Legal Opinion
State v. Pacheco
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 11, 1993No. 13662PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
Defendant appeals the trial court order disqualifying his counsel. We hold that this order is not a final, appealable order, and dismiss the appeal.
Defendant was one of a number of defendants who were charged with false voting in November 1990. Eleven of these defendants were represented by attorney Don Klein. When a hearing was called in November 1991, neither counsel nor all but one of his clients was present. The district attorney argued to the court that defense counsel should be disqualified because he was causing delays in the cases. Counsel eventually arrived,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MaesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. WatsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ApodacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Pena v. TrujilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Sanders v. RosenbergNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993