Legal Opinion

In re: E.D.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 2018No. COA17-693PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

*435 North Carolina law requires that a person who has been involuntarily committed to a mental health facility be examined by a physician within 24 hours of arrival at such a facility. In this case, the respondent was examined by a psychologist-rather than a physician-following her arrival at an inpatient mental health facility. The issue before us in this appeal is whether this statutory violation automatically requires us to vacate the trial court's order authorizing her continued commitment without the need for her to show that she was actually prejudiced by the violation.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. In Re HatleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. MacKeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. In re MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. In re BarnhillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re E.D.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API