Peytavin v. Winter
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL PROM THE SECOND DISTRICT, THE JUDGE OP THE FOURTH PRESIDING.
1Opinion of the Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court delivered by
Martin, J.
This is an action of trespass on the plaintiff’s land. The defendant claimed title in the locus in quo. There was a verdict and judgement against him with one thousand dollars damages; and he appealed.
His counsel has contended that the record, with the proof, place the case in so much confusion, that he believes it is not in a situation to receive the final action of this court. Parties who come to us for relief, must take care to bring their cases before us in such a manner, as to enable us to review the judgement…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Peytavin v. WinterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834