Smith v. Town of Morganton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Tbe plaintiff contends tbat be is a lower proprietor from whose land tbe natural flow of tbe-water in Henry River has been unreasonably diverted by tbe defendant; tbat by reason of such diversion tbe value of bis land has been diminished, and tbat be is entitled to tbe recovery of damages. His contention therefore involves tbe question of a riparian owner’s rights in a stream of water flowing through or adjacent to bis land. Such rights are governed by principles which have been settled and frequently applied.
Earnham says tbat a comprehensive statement of tbe rights of a riparian owner is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Durham v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- State v. . GlenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859
- Pugh v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1836
- Walton v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Harris v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pendergrast v. AikenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Whiteside Estates, Inc. v. Highlands Cove, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Hampton v. North Carolina Pulp Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Coastal Plains Utilities, Inc. v. New Hanover CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Freeman v. Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.