Legal Opinion

Isgette v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 1, 1986No. 85-1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERSEY, Chief Judge.

Upon revocation of appellant’s probation for intentionally running over one Greyson with his car, he elected to be sentenced under the guidelines. The sentence of five years in prison represents a four-category departure from the “any nonstate prison sanction” presumptive sentence justified by appellant’s thirty-three points, and he appeals.

Four reasons were given in the “order of departure” entered by the trial court. The first was:

The Court finds that the primary purpose of sentencing is to punish the offender, as stated in F.R.Cr.P. 3.701(b)(2), and the Court find that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Hendrix v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Knowlton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Boldes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ree v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Royal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API