Legal Opinion
Chaten v. Marketsmart LLC
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 14, 2020No. 8:19-cv-01165Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND TIMOTHY CHATEN, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * Civil Action No. PX-19-1165 * MARKETSMART LLC, et. al, * * Defendants * * ****** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS – ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, and Local Rule 301.5(b), the Honorable Paula Xinis referred this case to me to issue a report and make recommendations as to the reasonableness of the attorney’s fees and costs sought by Plaintiff Timothy Chaten (“Plaintiff”). (ECF No. 36). This “Report and Recommendations” addresses the “Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Khoury v. MeserveDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.