Southern California National Bank of Los Angeles v. Wyatt
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
This is an action upon a promissory note dated December 5, 1888, and payable ninety days after date. The instrument appears to be a joint note, signed by each of the defendants, with the word “ surety ” written after the name of defendant Busch.
The defendants, other than Busch, suffered default. He answered, and alleged that he signed the note neither as maker nor acceptor, and “ that he wrote his name upon said negotiable instrument as a surety, without any consideration whatever, but solely for the accommodation of the makers of said instrument, and delivered it, with his name…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aud v. MagruderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Dane v. CorduanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Damor v. PardowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Fessenden v. SummersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Chafoin v. RichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by3 opinions
- Figari v. OlceseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Randall v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Hinton v. LittleIdaho Supreme Court · 1931