Legal Opinion

Southern California National Bank of Los Angeles v. Wyatt

California Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1891No. 13725PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

This is an action upon a promissory note dated December 5, 1888, and payable ninety days after date. The instrument appears to be a joint note, signed by each of the defendants, with the word “ surety ” written after the name of defendant Busch.

The defendants, other than Busch, suffered default. He answered, and alleged that he signed the note neither as maker nor acceptor, and “ that he wrote his name upon said negotiable instrument as a surety, without any consideration whatever, but solely for the accommodation of the makers of said instrument, and delivered it, with his name…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aud v. MagruderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Dane v. CorduanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Damor v. PardowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Fessenden v. SummersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Chafoin v. RichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Figari v. OlceseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Randall v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Hinton v. LittleIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API