Jackson v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
If the defendant entertained the intent to steal the money at the time the letter containing it was delivered to him or when he assumed dominion over it and thereafter . extracted it from the envelope and converted it to his own use, and there was evidence tending to sustain this conclusion, he was guilty of larceny as charged in the first count of the indictment. Beckham v. State, 100 Ala. 15, 14 So. 859; Eggleston v. State, 129 Ala. 80, 30 So. 582, 87 Am.St. Rep. 17.
On the other hand if he formed the felonious purpose and intent to appropriate the money to his own use after…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kilgore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Beckham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Eggleston v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Sampson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Cawley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Vogel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Jordan v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Latham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.