Legal Opinion

Lance v. Dennis

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 21, 2006No. 05-555Published

1Opinion of the Court

546 U.S. 459 (2006)

LANCE ET AL.

v.

DENNIS, COLORADO SECRETARY OF STATE

No. 05-555.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 21, 2006.

2Per curiam

The Rooker-Feldman doctrine prevents the lower federal courts from exercising jurisdiction over cases brought by "state-court losers" challenging "state-court judgments rendered before the district court proceedings commenced." Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., 544 U.S. 280, 284 (2005). In this case, the District Court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit on the ground that they were in privity with a state-court loser. We hold that the…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

3Cases cited24 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API