Legal Opinion
Farmer v. Pike County Agricultural Society
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 27, 2005No. 2:05 CV 0664Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SMITH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs assert claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law, alleging that defen dants violated their due process rights by banning them from participating or assisting in livestock exhibitions at the Pike County Fair. Plaintiffs move for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”)(or preliminary injunction). For the reasons that follow the Court denies plaintiffs’ motion.
I. Background
Plaintiffs are individual citizens of Ohio. Plaintiff James Farmer is the father of plaintiffs Terri Farmer and Brooke Farmer Walls. Defendant Pike County Agricultural Society…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.