Legal Opinion

Helton v. Cook

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1975No. 7519SC470PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether plaintiff’s claim of title by adverse possession under G.S. 1-40 is *567defective as a matter of law because of her absence from the property for four months and nine months to serve separate prison sentences. In view of the unique circumstances surrounding Mrs. Helton’s occupation of the property, we hold that despite her temporary absences from the property in question Mrs. Helton’s possession was sufficiently continuous to ripen her claim of adverse possession for the twenty-year statutory period.

Plaintiff’s evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Malloy v. . BrudenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. Holdfast on Demise of Shaw v. ShepardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1846
  3. Cross v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Doe on Demises of Ward v. HerrinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1856

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McManus v. KluttzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. WATKINS v. THE PHILADELPHIA LAND BANKDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API