Legal Opinion

Matter of Duraku v. Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 2015No. 16193 653545/13Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered June 3, 2014, which denied the petition to vacate an arbitration award, dated July 15, 2013, denying petitioner’s claims of, inter alia, sexual discrimination against respondent Tishman Speyer Properties, L.P., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The arbitral award is not violative of public policy, irrational, or the product of partiality or bias (see CPLR 7511 [b]; Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v Transport Workers’ Union of Am,., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, 336 [2005]). Petitioner’s argument is based on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York City Transit Authority v. Transport Workers' Union of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. In re the Arbitration between Falzone & New York Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Kalfus v. KalfusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API