Legal Opinion

Independent Oil Men's Ass'n v. Fort Dearborn National Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 29, 1922No. Gen. No. 27,250PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Plaintiff "brought an action of assumpsit against the defendant to recover the proceeds of eleven checks with interest thereon, amounting to $1,514.08, which it claimed defendant had collected and refused to pay over on demand. At the close of all the evidence the court sustained plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict for the amount of its claim. A verdict was accordingly returned and judgment entered thereon, to reverse which defendant prosecutes this appeal.

The substance of plaintiff’s claim, as set up in its declaration, was that the defendant conducted a banking business in Chicago,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson Paper Manufacturing Co. v. Commercial National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Hamlin's Wizard Oil Co. v. United States Express Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Home Indemnity Co. v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. California Stucco Co. v. Marine National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. New York Casualty Co. v. SazenskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Woodlawn Trust & Savings Bank v. DonahoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API