Legal Opinion
FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint)
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 26, 2020No. 1:16-cv-12653Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS * * * * In re INTUNIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION Civil Action Nos. 1:16-cv-12653-ADB * (Both Direct and Indirect Cases) 1:16-cv-12396-ADB * * * * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO STRIKE BURROUGHS, D.J. Presently before the Court are Defendants’ motions to strike Section XII of the Plaintiffs’ response to Defendants’ Rule 56 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (“SOF”). [FWK 382; Picone 289].1 For the reasons that follow, the motions, [FWK 382; Picone 289], are GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background The Court has previously provided a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cabán Hernández v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- F.T.C. v. Actavis, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- CMI Capital Market Investment, LLC v. González-ToroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- NEPSK, Inc. v. Town of HoultonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Alsina-Ortiz v. LaboyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.