Legal Opinion

Sutorius v. North

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided March 2, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term. Action by Edward Sutorius against Isaac F. North upon an undertaking given to procure an order of arrest.

1Per curiam

The learned counsel for respondent appears to have misconceived the provisions of section 559 of the Code of Civil Procedure, regulating the terms of the undertaking required as a condition precedent to the granting of an order of arrest. The costs intended to be secured by the undertaking are not the costs of the action for which the defendant, in the event of his success, may recover judgment, but only such costs awarded to the defendant as accruing directly from the arrest, or in proceedings in the action, or otherwise, necessitated by such arrest. In the view, therefore, which we…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Feinstein v. JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Lafrentz v. MassNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  3. Palmer v. StarbuckCity of New York Municipal Court · 1892
  4. Sutorius v. NorthNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
  5. Sutorius v. NorthNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API