Legal Opinion

Kawecki v. Stuber-Stone Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1922No. Docket No. 181PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Codd (George P.), J. Assumpsit by Boleslaw P. Kawecki against StuberStone Company for breach of warranty in an exchange of automobiles. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The plaintiff, a real estate dealer in Detroit, visited the automobile show in that city in January, 1918. He there saw an Abbott touring car, specially painted, in the exhibit of the defendant, who was distributor of that make of car, then manufactured in Cleveland. Plaintiff concluded to purchase the car, if he could turn in an old Studebaker car he had as a part of the purchase price. He claims his attention was called to some spots of mud on the bottom of the *27car and that he said to Mr. Stuber, with whom he was negotiating, “That is not a second-hand car, is it?” and Mr. Stuber answered,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gridley v. Globe Tobacco Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Buchoz v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Black Motor Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Parkhouse v. HodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Victor v. D. E. Meyer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API