Legal Opinion

Segusky v. Williams

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 31, 1911No. 7992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Wilson, J., Greenville, June, 1910. Action by Tewis Segusky against J. H. William's. Plaintiff appeals. cite: 81 S. C. 134; 8 Ency. 419, note 25, 411; 22 S. C. 9; 57 S. C. 227. cites: 57 S. C. 262; 72 S. C. 192; 70 S. C. 429; 31 S. C. 342.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

1 2 This appeal is from an order granting a nonsuit in an action for malicious prosecution. Respondent’s contention that the order is not appealable is untenable. Bowen v. Johnson, 87 S. C. 264. The affidavit upon which the warrant was issued states nothing more than that, at the time and place mentioned, “Lewis Segusky did dispose of property under lien and removing same, all of which is contrary to the form of statute.” The warrant is as follows: “Arrest and bring before me Lewis Segusky. under lien charged with disposing property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whaley v. LawtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  2. Aiken v. Lancaster Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elletson v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  2. Nelson v. HillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API