In Re: Abdur Amin Rashid
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The question for decision is whether an order to pay restitution to fraud victims in a federal criminal proceeding at a time prior to the September 1994 amendments of the Bankruptcy Code is dischargeable in bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. § 523. The District Court determined that Abdur Amin Rashid’s restitution obligation was statutorily exempt from discharge as a “fine, penalty, or forfeiture payable to and for the benefit” of the United States under § 523(a)(7). We conclude that Appellant’s restitution obligation was dischargeable in bankruptcy because it was payable to the…
3Cases cited28 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.