Legal Opinion

In Re: Abdur Amin Rashid

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 14, 2000No. D.C. 95-cv-04243; D.C. 96-cv-00512; 98-1719UnknownCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The question for decision is whether an order to pay restitution to fraud victims in a federal criminal proceeding at a time prior to the September 1994 amendments of the Bankruptcy Code is dischargeable in bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. § 523. The District Court determined that Abdur Amin Rashid’s restitution obligation was statutorily exempt from discharge as a “fine, penalty, or forfeiture payable to and for the benefit” of the United States under § 523(a)(7). We conclude that Appellant’s restitution obligation was dischargeable in bankruptcy because it was payable to the…

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re: Abdur Amin Rashid, Debtor Abdur Amin Rashid v. Virginia R. Powel (d.c. No. 95-Cv-04243) in Re: Abdur Amin Rashid, Debtor Abdur Amin Rashid v. The United States of America Virginia R. Powel (d.c. No. 96-Cv-00512) Abdur Amin RashidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API