Legal Opinion

Safouane v. Fleck

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 30, 2007No. 05-35394PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*757MEMORANDUM *

Acting pro se, Aziz and Sarah Safouane (the “Safouanes”) filed this action on April 10, 2000, alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3), and supplemental state law claims against over one hundred defendants. They joined as plaintiffs their seven minor children and three paternal relatives. The district court concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction as to some of the claims, the children and paternal relatives lacked standing, the Safouanes failed to state a claim as to other causes of action, no genuine issue of material fact remained in dispute as to some of…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kolley v. ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICESDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  2. (PS) Morgan v. WongDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. A.C. v. Jeany ZepedaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2026
  4. Beltran Ex Rel. Beltran v. Santa Clara CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Caruso v. PearceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API