Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ruth v. Peshek

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 3, 1931No. 21974Published

1DissentKornegay, J.

I cannot agree with the logic of the opinion and the method of thought used to arrive at the conclusion. I think it violates the Constitution, the fundamental law of the state, and also the legislative enactments concerning the exercise by the people of direct legislation. I further believe that the petition, signed by the respective voters in this case, is emasculated by this opinion. The petition is before the court, and the time for holding the election is just as much a part of that petition as the asking for the election. The people who proposed this election had a right to specify the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Initiative Petition, City of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Looney v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Short v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. In Re SpringerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Ruth v. MerrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API