Legal Opinion

People v. Benard

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter J. Benitez, J.

Defendant was originally charged with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, Penal Law § 220.21, a class A-l felony, in a felony complaint which alleged that he possessed a mixture of cocaine and other substances having an aggregate weight in excess of four *178ounces. After plea discussions between the special narcotics prosecutor and defense counsel the People agreed to dismiss the charge of Penal Law § 220.21 and add a charge of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, Penal Law § 221.16, a class B…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. VilardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. SimmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. StanardNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. People v. CurryNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. BenardNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. People v. RodriguezNew York Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API