State v. Board of Education
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 28 Vroom 605. Upon certiorari, proceedings contempláting the raising of moneys by special tax upon taxable property in the township of Cranbury for school purposes and the issuance of bonds by the board of education of that township were reviewed by the Supreme Court and sustained as legal.
Read the full summary
On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 28 Vroom 605. Upon certiorari, proceedings contempláting the raising of moneys by special tax upon taxable property in the township of Cranbury for school purposes and the issuance of bonds by the board of education of that township were reviewed by the Supreme Court and sustained as legal. In virtue of the direction of the board of education of the township named, this notice was duly published as the statute (Pcmph. L. 1894,p. 511, § 11) requires: “notice of a special school meeting. “Notice is hereby given to the legal…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The Chancellor.
The nineteenth section of the amendment to the “Act to establish a system of public instruction [Revision], approved March 27th, 1874,” which was approved May 25th, 1894 (Pamph. L., p. 506; Gen. Stat., p. 3060), provides that the legal voters of a school district, either at an annual meeting or at a special meeting called for that purpose, may, by the consent of a majority of those present, authorize the board of education of the district to issue bonds for these purposes:
(а) The purchase of land for school purposes.
(б) The building of a…
2Cited by4 opinions
- City of Louisville v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Board of Sup'rs of Forrest Co. v. ClarkMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
- Board of Education v. McLeanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- King v. LambertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1919