Berlin Machine Works v. Bradford-Kennedy Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
APPEAL from the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District for Bonner County. Hon. Robert N. Dunn, Judge. Action in replevin. Judgment for defendant and intervenor. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.
A motion has been made to dismiss this appeal on the grounds that the notice of appeal has not been served on the adverse parties in action. The appeal has been taken by the plaintiff, the Berlin Machine Works, and notice was served on the defendant, Bradford-Kennedy Company, but no service has been had on the intervenor, Dehlbom Lumber Company.
The question to be determined on this motion is: Was the intervenor, Dehlbom Lumber Company, an “adverse party” within the meaning of sec. 4808, Rev. Codes, as the same has been construed by the decisions of this court? (Diamond Bank v. Van Meter, 18…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Potlatch Lumber Co. v. RunkelIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Nelson Bennett Co. v. Twin Falls Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1907
- Titiman v. Alamance Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1903
- Diamond Bank v. Van MeterIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Gold Hunter Mining & Smelting Co. v. HollemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mitchell v. Banking Corp. of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Berlin Machine Works v. Dehlbom Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
- Sonleitner v. McLarenIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Chapman v. BoehmIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
- Cook v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.