Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Henderson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Talladega. Tried before the Hon. George E. Brewer. The facts of.this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The plaintiff moved to strike the claim of exemptions from the file, on the ground that the amount claimed had been paid to the claimant by the garnishee, and that the amount paid by the defendant company could not be claimed as exempt.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Talladega. Tried before the Hon. George E. Brewer. The facts of.this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The plaintiff moved to strike the claim of exemptions from the file, on the ground that the amount claimed had been paid to the claimant by the garnishee, and that the amount paid by the defendant company could not be claimed as exempt. The court -sustained the motion and struck the claim of exemptions from the' file, and rendered j udgment against the garnishee for the amount due the plaintiff and for the costs of suit. To each of these rulings…
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKELL, C. J
On the 25th of July, 1892, the appellee, Henderson, recovered judgment in the circuit court of Talladega, founded on contract, against the appellant Crane, for the sum of $218.40 damages, besides costs. On the 29th of May, 1895,'Henderson made affidavit, that the appellant, the Pullman Palace Oar Company, a corporation, was supposed to be indebted to Crane, and praying process of garnishment to obtain satisfaction of the judgment. A garnishment was issued and was served on June 11, 1895. At the ensuing term of the circuit court, the Car Company filed an answer denying all…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Roden & Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Boylston v. Rankin & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1896