People v. Moyer
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Look, J.) Eespondent was convicted of receiving stolen goods. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Eespondent was convicted of receiving stolen goods, and brings the case before us on exceptions. The trial took place nearly two years ago, and the exceptions were settled, under the statute, from the stenographer's minutes, the judge who tried the prisoner being out of office. The Attorney General very justly declined to argue in favor of the proceedings, and they need but brief mention.
At the opening of the trial the prosecuting attorney's assistant, in charge of the prosecution, said to the jury:
*572“ One reason why I am more prejudiced against this man is because he has committed perjury in…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Bolden v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- People v. SpringsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- O'Loughlin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.