Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Crothers v. La Salle Institute

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1977No. 48871Published

1Concurrence

MR. JUSTICE DOOLEY,

specially concurring:

While concurring in this decision, I must note my objection to McGovern v. Standish (1976), 65 Ill. 2d 54 (68 Ill. 2d at 407-08), which interprets the statutory words “in charge of” to require proof that “the defendantjnust have been in charge of the particular operations which involved the violation from which the alleged injury arose” (65 Ill. 2d 54, 67). This is contrary to the very language of the Structural Work Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1967, ch. 48, pars. 60-69), and to prior decisions of this court and other courts on the issue as to what constitutes…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Miller v. DeWittIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Larson v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Gannon v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Halberstadt v. Harris Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Louis v. BarenfangerIllinois Supreme Court · 1968

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API