Nadler v. F & D Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*499 SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiffs Allen Nadler and Edward Cappetta sued defendant F & D Associates, Inc. (“F & D”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, alleging principally that F & D sold their furniture in violation of New York’s warehouseman’s hen statute. See N.Y. U.C.C. § 7-210 (McKinney 2002). F & D counter-claimed for storage fees incurred in connection with plaintiffs’ furniture. The district court (Poliak, M.J.) entered judgment in favor of F & D on October 2, 2002 after a bench trial. On the storage fees cross-claim, the district court denied F & D…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lopresti v. TerwilligerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., v. the Clorox CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Chisholm-Ryder Co. v. Sommer & SommerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Mobil Shipping and Transportation Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Wonsild Liquid Carriers Ltd., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Gurney, Becker & Bourne, Inc. v. Benderson Development Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.