Legal Opinion
Hodges v. McDuff
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Wayne. (Hosmeif, J.) Defendant McDuff applied for a rehearing, which application was denied, and a supplemental decree made fixing the compensation of defendants as trustees, etc., at $100, from which decree, as also the order denying a rehearing, he appealed. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The substance of the bill and answers in this ease will be found stated in Hodges v. McDuff, 69 Mich. 76 (36 N. W. Rep. 704).
After the filing of the opinion reported as above, and on the fifth day of May, 1888, the following decree was entered in the circuit court for the county of Wayne, in chancery:
“ This cause came on to be heard on pleadings and proofs taken in open court, and the court having heard Edwin F. Conely, solicitor for the complainant, and Henry M. Oheever, solicitor for the defendants, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed, and this court, by virtue of the power in it vested,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hodges v. McDuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by2 opinions
- Horning v. Saginaw Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Blaske v. BlaskeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971