Legal Opinion
Schroeder v. Perkel
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 15, 1981Published
1Opinion of the Court
87 N.J. 53 (1981)
432 A.2d 834
ANN SCHROEDER, BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM MARION SCHROEDER; AND JOHN SCHROEDER AND MARION SCHROEDER, INDIVIDUALLY; AND THOMAS SCHROEDER BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, MARION SCHROEDER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
HAROLD PERKEL, M.D. AND BERNARD VENIN, M.D., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 12, 1981.
Decided July 15, 1981.
Richard C. Ehnert argued the cause for appellants (Chasan, Leyner, Holland & Tarrant, attorneys).
Donald L. Mantel argued the cause for respondents (Weiner, Ostranger, Pearl & Mantel, attorneys).
The opinion of the Court was…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Portee v. JaffeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Berman v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.