Legal Opinion
YANEZ-CARRILLO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1963No. 1302PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision 40302 MATTER OF YANEZ-CARRILLO In EXCLUSION Proceedings , A-13536165 Decided by Board August 27, 1963 The retention provisions of section 301(b), Immigration and Nationality Act, requiring continuous physical presence in the United States for at least 5 years between the ages of 14 and 28, do not operate to deprive an individual of United States citizenship until he has had a reasonable opportunity to come to the United States as a U.S. citizen after learning of such claim to citizenship. EsoLtmanrx: Act of 1052—Section 212(a) (20) [8 U.S.C. 1182(a) (20)1—Im- migrant without…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nishikawa v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Yuba Consolidated Gold Fields v. KilkearyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Perri v. DullesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- William P. Rogers, as Attorney General of the United States of America v. Urho Paavo PatokoskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Petition of AcchioneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thadeus Drozd, A/K/A Adam Passoni v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Runnett v. ShultzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Runnett v. ShultzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Jose Miguel Ramos-Hernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Guerra Vasquez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2026