Legal Opinion

Cooperative Power Association v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1984No. 83-1622PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes to us on appeal of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (Commission’s) orders regarding a rate change. The Commission allowed the rates to become effective but granted a hearing into their reasonableness. We uphold the orders of the Commission and refuse to order the current rates suspended or the presently collected charges refunded.

Facts

Minnesota Power & Light Company (MP & L) provides power to Cooperative Power Association (CPA) on a contractual basis. On September 2, 1982, MP & L filed with the Commission two proposed contracts involving changes in the rates charged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cities of Carlisle & Neola v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Tuepker v. Farmers Home AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  3. Petrolite Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Xcel Energy Services Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. Cooperative Power Association v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. State of Iowa Ex Rel. Miller v. BlockDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1984
  4. Higgins v. JC Penney, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API