Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 29, 2010No. 59366-8-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

229 P.3d 901 (2010)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Bobby Ray THOMPSON, Appellant.

No. 59366-8-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

March 29, 2010.

David Bruce Koch, Nielsen Broman Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Seth Aaron Fine, Attorney at Law, Snohomish Co. Pros. Ofc., Everett, WA, for Respondent.

GROSSE, J.

¶ 1 A postconviction motion for DNA testing of semen samples in a rape case should be granted when testing would provide new information about the rapist's identity and favorable results would establish the defendant's innocence on a more probable than not basis. Here, there…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RioftaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. CrumptonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. State Of Washington v. Jerome Ceasar AlvertoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API