Legal Opinion

United States Guarantee Co. v. Hamilton Nat. Bank

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

*145Both parties have filed petition for certiorari and have raised questions that are of importance to both banks and depositors. Because of the importance of these questions, we have heretofore granted both petitions for certiorari. The determinative questions are: (1) Is a paid surety, who discharges its obligations to its obligee, precluded from the right of action which the obligee had against a third party (for the wrongful acts of the third party) when the surety pays the loss of the obligee and takes an assignment therefor? (2) To what extent must a depositor in a bank examine his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Figuers v. FlyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Darling Stores, Inc. v. Fidelity-Bankers Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Jackson Ex Rel. Greater St. Matthews Baptist Church v. First National Bank of Memphis, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
  3. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. Hamilton Nat. Bank, for Use and Benefit of Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  4. McCann Steel Co. v. THIRD NATIONAL BANK IN NASHVILLECourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960
  5. Nashville Trust Co. v. Southern Buyers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API