Legal Opinion

Mahler v. Birnbaum

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1972No. 11008PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Invoking our original jurisdiction under art. 5, § 9 of the Idaho Constitution, 1 plaintiff has applied for a writ of mandate compelling appointment of counsel to represent her in a prosecution for a petty misdemeanor. Plaintiff is charged with public drunkenness, a violation of the Caldwell municipal code, 2 which carries a penalty of incarceration for no more than thirty days or a fine not exceeding three hundred dollars, or both. The Idaho Code provides for appointed counsel only in prosecutions for felonies or other “serious crimes” punishable by confinement for more than six months or a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Gregg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Empy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Sweeney v. OtterIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. McCurdyIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. MeesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API