Legal Opinion

Steele v. McDonald

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided July 11, 2006No. 10-05-00266-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONCURRING OPINION TO LETTER ORDER

TOM GRAY, Chief Justice.

Because the majority refuses to notify the practitioners of what appears to be a fundamental shift in the variance from the rules that the majority is willing to accept, I feel I must do so.

Recently in Reed v. State, the Court sent the following letter:

The Court received and filed the Brief of Appellant on May 5, 2006. Because the brief does not contain the “Identities of Parties and Counsel” and a “Summary of the Argument,” it does not comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.1(a) and 38.1(g). See Tex.R.App. P. 38.1(a),…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sweed v. City of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Billy Dean Walker, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  2. Gene C. Steele, Individually and as Independent of the Estate of William B. Duke, Sally Steele, and Tom F. Simmons v. Dorothy McDonald, Individually and as Independent of the Estate of John B. McDonald, Bobby Reed, Joe Cannon, Cara H. Hughes, Eugene T. McLaughlin, Stanley F. Swenson, Jerry Calhoon, J. Christopher Kolstad, Bobby Freeman, Devon ......., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  3. In Re Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  4. In Re Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  5. Steele v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API