Legal Opinion
Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. United States Forest Serv.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 11, 2004No. CIV. 03-213-KIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KING, District Judge.
Two environmental organizations, the Oregon Natural Desert Association (“ONDA”) and the Center for Biological Diversity (“CBD”), bring an action against the United States Forest Service and a forest supervisor. Plaintiffs allege defendants are violating the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (‘WSRA”), the National Forest Management Act (“NFMA”), the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), and the Rescissions Act, by failing to implement the Malheur and North Fork Malheur comprehensive river management plans, by failing to “protect and enhance” the river…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Parrino v. FHP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- General Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists v. Seventh-Day Adventist Congregational Church John R. MarikCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oregon Natural Desert Association v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Hosseini v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014
- Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. SaboDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Oregon Natural Desert Association v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Wildearth Guardians v. US Forest ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021