Pacholder v. Rosenheim
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Cross-Appeals from' the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. (Hawkins, J.) The facts are1 stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.
On the first day of June, 1896, Mitchell S'. Pacholder executed a will which, he had directed prepared by his attorney. Mr. Pacholder was at the time a widower. Subsequently oil the1 22nd March, 1899, he married Clara N. Pacholder, the appellant in No. 29, and lived until the month of October, 1914, hut except as hereinafter noted made no change, and attempted to make none, in the provisions of his will executed in 1896.
The will executed by Mr. .Pacholder in 1896 was in typewriting, and the will as found after his death in 1914 was the same paper, hut contained quite a number of alterations…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hogan v. . CurtinNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Eschbach v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
- Stake v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- Sloan v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Cronise v. HardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Will of LibermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Marriott v. MarriottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Gordon v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Harrison v. PrenticeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Grove v. FrameCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.