Legal Opinion

Muhleman v. Hoey

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 8, 1942No. 88PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs, as executors of the last will of Arthur C. Mower, brought this suit in the Southern District of New York to recover the income taxes which he had paid on $310,706.24 that he received in 1932 by way of a bonus in addition to his regular salary for services performed abroad in 1931.

This amount was paid to him in this country by the American Tobacco Company during 1932 for his services performed in 1931, while a resident of London, Eng., as the manager of its foreign subsidiaries. He reported his income on the cash basis for the calendar year 1932 but did not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Lucas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. White v. HofferbertDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1950
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Fiske's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  3. In Re Freedomland, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. Ken-Rad Tube & Lamp Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Ken-Rad Transmitting Tube Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  5. Pacific Wholesalers, Inc. v. MangerichDistrict Court, D. Guam · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API