Ortiz v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Jose Ortiz appeals an order denying his rule 3.850 motion as untimely filed. We agree that the motion was timely filed and reverse and remand for the trial court to consider the motion on the merits.
On direct appeal, this court issued an opinion affirming appellant’s convictions. Ortiz v. State, 869 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Thereafter, appellant timely sought discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court. The supreme court stayed the proceedings pending review of a certified question in McLean v. State, 854 So.2d 796 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). After deciding McLean v. State, 934 So.2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McLean v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- McLean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Mullins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Perkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Ortiz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- MONFISTON v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011