Legal Opinion

O'Nate v. Bahr

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 21, 1933No. 6663PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment in a suit in equity for an injunction and an accounting based on the alleged infringement of patent No. 1,582,50o1, issued to the plaintiff, Theodore P. Bahr, for a method of cutting the back of the front seat of an automobile arid inserting a binge joint so- that the back of the séat could be lowered to a horizontal position so as to form a bed, together with the seat cushions of the front and back seats.

The bill of complaint alleges that the plaintiff was the owner of the patent in question issued April 27, 1926, and that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Dunlap v. SchofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Marsh v. Nichols, Shepard & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Hendrie v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Flat Slab Patents Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nike, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. And Hawe Yue, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API