Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Canterbury

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 28, 2004No. 03SC294Published

1Opinion of the Court

92 P.3d 961 (2004)

Noah TAYLOR, as personal representative of the Estate of Terrell Taylor, Petitioner

v.

Lucy I. CANTERBURY, Respondent.

No. 03SC294.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

June 28, 2004.

Frederickson & Johnson, P.C., Bryan T. Fredrickson, Canon City, Colorado, Attorneys for Petitioner.

Dufford & Brown, P.C., Joanne Herlihy, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Respondent.

Montgomery Little & McGrew, P.C., Frederick B. Skillern, for Amicus Curiae for the Real Estate Law Section of the Colorado Bar Association.

Justice KOURLIS delivered the Opinion of the Court.

I. INTRODUCTION

The question we…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Gwinn v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Tenhet v. BoswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Smith v. GreenburgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  5. First National Bank v. Energy Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API