Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Thormyer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1959No. 35758Published

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.

The first question1 to be considered is whether compensation for the part of this land taken and damages to the residue thereof not taken can be based upon evidence as to its value for commercial uses notwithstanding that the commissioners held such land under what will be referred to as a restricted tenure, because title thereto was held under a deed preventing the commissioners from using the land except for a children’s home or from selling it.

Although in 1 Orgel on Valuation under Eminent Domain (2 Ed.), 187, Section 41 it is said that “no precise or uniform rule of valuation of property…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Williams v. McMillanOhio Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Town of Winchester v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  4. Sowers v. SchaefferOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API