Legal Opinion

Pampena v. Musk

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 24, 2023No. 3:22-cv-05937Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 GIUSEPPE PAMPENA, Case No. 22-cv-05937-CRB 9 Plaintiff, ORDER APPOINTING LEAD 10 v. PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL 11 ELON MUSK, 12 Defendant. 13 Before the Court are dueling motions to appoint lead plaintiff and lead counsel in 14 this action under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). 15 Mohammed Samara (“Samara”) moves for appointment as lead plaintiff and seeks 16 appointment of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP as lead counsel. See Samara 17 Mot. (dkt. 6). Brian…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Sullivan v. Chase Investment Services of Boston, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
  4. Chill v. Green Tree Financial Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  5. Khunt v. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API